Disposed
The Principal, v. L. Vaishnavi
Telangana HCWA/34/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No. 34 OF 2016
Date: 22.01.2016
Between:
The Principal Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
L. Vaishnavi & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT APPEAL No. 34 OF 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
This appeal by the appellant – institute is directed against one line order, dated 31.12.2015, passed in W.P.M.P.No.49687 of 2015 in W.P.No.38599 of 2015, which reads thus:
“There shall be interim direction as prayed for.”
In the writ petition, respondent No.1 has made the following
prayer:
“For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner in the forthcoming II-Semester, B.Tech, Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, IV year, in Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Chaitanya Bharathi P.O. Gandipet, Hyderabad, Telangana State by granting exemption of attendance to the petitioner and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
We are informed that the appellant – institution has already filed counter affidavit and placed all materials in support of their case and that the writ petition is ready for hearing.
Keeping that in view and considering the nature of the impugned order and the prayer in the writ petition, we are not inclined to interfere with the same and we are satisfied that the following order will meet the ends of justice:
“Learned Single Judge, who is assigned to hear the writ petitions, is requested to hear and decide the instant writ petition expeditiously in view of the fact that an academic career of the writ petitioner is at stake. It is made clear that we have not examined merits of the case.”
With the above observations, writ appeal is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 22.01.2016 ES
The Principal Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad
L. Vaishnavi & others
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court