The High Court disposed of this writ appeal as not pressed by the appellant. The counsel requested the learned Single Judge to decide the underlying writ petition expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No.218 of 2016
Dt:10.03.2016
Between: K.D.Madhushekhar. … Appellant And The Ministry of Home Affairs and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No.218 of 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Mr.V.Ganesh Bhujanga Rao, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant would be satisfied if writ petition itself is decided finally.
This writ appeal is directed against an interlocutory order passed by learned Single Judge on W.P.M.P.No.26937 of 2013, whereby the petitioner’s prayer for interim suspension of his termination has been rejected.
Keeping that in view, the writ appeal is disposed of as not pressed with a request to learned Single Judge to decide the writ petition expeditiously.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________
________________________
Dt:10.03.2016 kdl
K.D. Madhushekhar
Ministry of Home Affairs
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
