The writ appeal, filed by the Telangana Class-IV Employees Central Association challenging an order of the Mandal Executive Magistrate, was disposed of as infructuous because the Revenue Divisional Officer had already handed over the disputed building to the Association.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1539 OF 2005
19-02-2016
Between:
Telangana Class-IV Employees Central Association, Hyderabad, rep., by its President K. Gangadhar and another
… Appellants
And
Mandal Executive Magistrate and Mandal Revenue Officer, Adilabad
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 1539 OF 2005
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri Durga Reddy, learned Government Pleader has placed on record written instructions received by him from the Tahsildar, Adilabad stating that the then Revenue Divisional Officer, Adilabad had issued instructions dated 18-09-2012 and handed over building/structure in dispute to the President of Telangana Class-IV Employees Central Association of Adilabad Town and in view thereof, he submits that nothing survives in the writ appeal.
Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute the submission made by Sri Durga Reddy.
In view thereof, the writ appeal is disposed of as rendered infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
19-02-2016 ks
Telangana Class-IV Employees Central Association
Mandal Executive Magistrate and Mandal Revenue Officer
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
