The court disposed of the writ appeal, holding it should follow the outcome of pending Supreme Court cases on the same subject matter as a batch of related appeals.
Writ appeal disposed to same effect as batch; miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT APPEAL No. 1285 of 2016
JUDGMENT: (Per VRS,J)
The order impugned in this writ appeal was the subject matter of a batch of writ appeals in W.A.Nos.823, 824, 826, 828 and 829 of 2016, disposed of by another Bench of this Court, by an order, dated 07.09.2016. Therefore, following the same, this Writ Appeal is also disposed of, to the same effect, namely, that the order of the single Judge will be subject to the outcome of the cases pending before the Supreme Court.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ appeal shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
G. SHYAM PRASAD, J
25th November, 2016 cbs
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN √ AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Appeal No. 1285 of 2016 (Per VRS,J)
25th November, 2016
cbs
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
G. SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
