This court dismissed a second appeal as withdrawn by the appellant with liberty to seek appropriate legal remedies. Consequently, the cross appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedies; cross appeal disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
SECOND APPEAL NO.632 OF 2016
DATED:19-08-2016
Between: Nambala Venkata Rao … Appellant And Tara Malleswara Rao and others … Respondents
COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. N. Aswini Kumar, for Mr. D.V. Sitarama Murthy
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: -
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT:
This second appeal arises out of judgment and decree dt.21.07.2006 in A.S. No.180 of 2000 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam.
Mr. N. Aswini Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, requested for permission of the Court to withdraw the second appeal with liberty to his client to avail appropriate remedies available for him in law.
The second appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made.
As a sequel to dismissal of the second appeal, S.A.M.P. No.1524 of 2016 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
_______________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 19-08-2016 bnr
Nambala Venkata Rao
Tara Malleswara Rao
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
