Single judge order dismissing a Civil Revision Petition (No.625 of 2011) for default because the petitioner failed to file any representation despite listing for dismissal.
Revised petition dismissed for default. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Civil Revision Petition No.625 of 2011
ORDER:
As there was no representation for the revision petitioners on 29.06.2016, the revision was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Despite listing the matter today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the revision petition.
Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in the CRP shall also stand dismissed.
_____________________ M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
01.07.2016 Vjl
M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
