with regard to purchase of the property there are two registered sale deeds dated 12.1.2005 and she filed certified copies along with the written statement, but she did not file the same. It appears that the petitioner earlier filed O.S.No.152 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chirala and the same was dismissed for non-prosecution. The original documents of the sale deeds were filed in the said suit and nothing prevented her from obtaining the certified copies of the same. The petitioner states that she was examined as DW1 in the present suit. It appears that she sold the property to some third parties during pendency of the present proceedings and the third parties cannot get better title than what she has got since the suit is filed for declaration on the averment that the plaintiffs purchased the property under two registered sale deeds dated 24.10.2007. It is in the fitness of things that the petitioner herein, who is defendant in the suit, shall be allowed to file the documents by permitting her to further depose as DW1 in continuance of her earlier deposition. Probably, the petitioner did not evince any interest in view of sale of the properties to third parties during pendency of the suit and that cannot be a circumstance for her to be negligent in prosecuting the present case.
