SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Civil…
petition dismissed for default as petitioners were not present despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Civil Revision Petition No.5246 of 2011
ORDER:
As there was no representation for the revision petitioners on 09.06.2016, the revision was directed to be listed on 14.06.2016 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, when the matter was listed on 16.06.2016, the learned counsel for the petitioners made a request and, therefore, the revision was directed to be listed on 29.06.2016 under the same caption. On that day, at request, the revision was directed to be listed on 07.07.2016. When the revision came up for hearing today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the revision petition.
The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 is present.
Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in the CRP shall also stand dismissed.
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
08.07.2016 Vjl
Revision Petitioners
Respondents 1 and 2
M.Seetharama Murti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
