This is a single-paragraph order where the court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the civil revision petition and dismissed it as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Permission to withdraw the civil revision petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
FRIDAY THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 391 of 2016
Between: Jagannadha Swamy Temple Trust Changanti Vari Palem, Regd.No. 8/2008 Represented by its President & Secretary Kalagotla Annatha Padmanabha Reddy … Petitioner Vs. Shaik Fathima & Ors. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Nageswara Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared
The Court made the following: [order follows]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 391 OF 2016
O R D E R :
After arguing the matter for considerable length of time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the Civil
Revision Petition.
2. Permission is granted as prayed for.
3. The Civil Revision Petition is accordingly dismissed as
withdrawn.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in the
Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as
to costs.
KAIT.
03/06/2016
I s L
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 391 OF 2016
Date: 03/06/2016 Circulation No. Court Master: I s L
Jagannadha Swamy Temple Trust Changanti Vari Palem
Shaik Fathima & Ors.
Suresh Kumar Kait
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
