High Court disposed of a civil revision petition assailing the dismissal of an application to recall DW.1 due to lack of reasons. Court directed fresh application with reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3319 of 2016
ORDER:
Assailing the order dated 28.03.2016 passed in I.A.No.306 of 2016 in O.S.No.469 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the constitution of India, wherein and whereunder an application filed to recall DW.1 was dismissed.
A perusal of the material on record would show that the trial Court dismissed the petition only on the ground that the petition is silent as to the reason for recalling DW.1. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh application by giving reasons, in which event the trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law.
With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
21.07.2016 gkv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Praveen Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
