Admittedly, the suit was filed after grant of permanent injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act alleging that the defendant is in possession and enjoyment of the property while complaining that the respondents are threatening to interfere. Therefore, if there is dispute between two individuals regarding possession of the property belonging to Wakf or not they are not inviting any decision from the trial Court whether it is a Wakf property or not or whether the property is Shia Wakf or Sunni Wakf. Since the jurisdiction vested on the Tribunal under Section 7 of the Act is limited and injunction can be granted by a Civil Court under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act when the dispute is purely between two individual not pertaining to rights in Wakf property. However, the scope of trial in a suit for permanent injunction is limited and the Courts while exercising power cannot go into title of the parties attaching finality, but to a limited extent the Court can go into title to find out who is in lawful possession as on the date of filing suit. Therefore, it is made clear the trial Court is not required to record any finding as to the title to the property claimed by either plaintiff or defendant but permitted to go into,
