The High Court disposed of a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 challenging the non-disposal of an interim stay application. It directed the trial court to decide the application within three months.
The trial court is directed to pass orders on I.A.No.1764 of 2015 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2431 of 2016
ORDER:
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the non disposal of I.A.No.1764 of 2015 in A.S.No.27 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District.
Though various grounds are raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the stay application filed vide I.A.No.1764 of 2015 in A.S.No.27 of 2015 may be directed to be disposed of at the earliest. It is his case that I.A.No.1764 of 2015 was filed in the month of December, 2015 and till date no orders are passed.
Having regard to the above circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of directing the trial Court to pass orders, in accordance with law in I.A.No.1764 of 2015, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions pending if any in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed.
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
15.07.2016 vhb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court ought to be directed to dispose of the pending stay application within a specific timeframe.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
