5. Per contra, the case of the plaintiffs, in brief, is as follows: - “The material allegations in the affidavit filed in support of the request of the defendants 4 and 5 are false. In the earlier the proceedings in O.S.No.124 of 2006 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ongole, the Joint SubRegistrar-I, Ongole had furnished information to the said Court by a letter dated 07.03.2007 that his search revealed that no sale deed dated 17.06.1959 was registered in his office. Thus, the said endorsement of the Sub-Registrar would show that there is no document dated 17.06.1959; therefore, the subsequent documents being relied upon by the defendants which are the off shoots of the earlier document are void and invalid and it is obvious that the said two registered sale deeds dated 15.02.2006 and 01.03.2006 are forged and fabricated and hence, the same cannot be received on file. Further, the defendants 4 and 5 had intentionally withheld the vital document, i.e., a Will Deed dated 12.09.1986 executed by Chinigepalli Andralamma and also a registered Relinquishment Deed dated 07.10.2005, which are relevant to the present lis. For suppression of the said vital documents and for coming to the Court with unclean hands, their defence is liable to be thrown out at any stage of the proceedings and hence, the petition is liable to be dismissed.”
