Disposed

G Vijhaya Lakshmi v. The Commissioner

Telangana HC15 Mar 2016CRP/1316/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, to dispose of Maintenance Application No. 2 of 2012 within six weeks upon deposit of ₹3,65,400 by petitioners. Respondent was restrained from taking coercive action pending disposal.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Senior Civil Judge, Nellore to dispose of M.A.S. No. 2 of 2012 within 6 weeks if petitioners deposit ₹3,65,400; respondent restrained from coercive steps.

G Vijhaya Lakshmi Vs The Commissioner — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN

¶3

Present

¶4

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1316 of 2016

¶6

Between:

¶7

G. Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o. G.V. Subrahmanyam Guptha, Hindu, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.16/324, M.V. Agraharam, Nellore & another

¶8

.. Petitioners

¶9

AND The Commissioner, Nellore Municipal Corporation, Nellore.

¶10

.. Respondent

¶11

The Court made the following:

¶12

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

¶13

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1316 of 2016

¶14

ORDER:

¶15

Heard Mr. T.C. Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Panduranga Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.

¶16

2. The grievance of the petitioners is restricted to delay in disposing of M.A.S.No.2 of 2012 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nellore.

¶17

3. Mr. T.C. Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are prepared to deposit a further sum of Rs.3,65,400/- at the earliest and thereafter, a request for expeditious disposal of M.A.S.No.2 of 2012 by the Senior Civil Judge, Nellore.

¶18

4. The statement is placed on record and accepted.

¶19

5. The Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, is directed to dispose of the M.A.S.No.2 of 2012, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioners filing proof of payment of Rs.3,65,400/(Rupees three lakhs sixty five thousand four hundred only) as noted above.

¶20

6. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. Till the disposal of the M.A.S.No. 2 of 2012, the respondent is directed not to take coercive steps against the

¶21

petitioners/the tenant in occupation of the premises. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this civil revision petition shall stand closed.

¶22

__________________ S.V. BHATT, J

¶23

Date: 15^th March, 2016

¶24

¶25

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

¶26

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1316 of 2016

¶27

Date: 15^th March, 2016

¶28

G Vijhaya Lakshmi v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Vijhaya Lakshmi v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Official liquidator, Vs from DT.01-04-2014 to 30-09-2014.

The Official liquidator, Vs from DT.01-04-2014 to 30-09-2014.

B.Siva Nageswara Rao Vs The Assistant Registrar, Sdlco

Smt. Ramayanam Rama Lakshmi, Vs A.P Electricity Regulatory Commission

Valina Surya Bhaskar Rao, Vs The District Collector (Cooperation)

The Official liquidator, Vs from DT.01-04-2014 to 30-09-2014.