2. Respondent No.2 is the wife of petitioner No.1. She filed D.V.C.No.358 of 2012 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderbad at Erramanzil against the petitioners seeking certain reliefs under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Petitioner No.1 is represented by his General Power of Attorney Holder – petitioner No.2 before the trial Court. The said G.P.A. was cancelled by the trial Court vi d e order, dated 23.6.2014, and he was set ex parte in the D.V.C. in view of his absence before the trial Court. Pending D.V.C., the petitioners preferred Crl.A.(SR)No.8281 of 2015 before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The petitioners filed Crl.M.P.No.1870 of 2015 to condone the delay of 406 days for filing the petition to set aside the ex parte order against petitioner No.1 and the same was dismissed by the trial Court with an observation that the delay of 406 days has not been properly explained. Aggrieved by the same, the present Revision Case is filed by the appellants.
