3. Cognizance was taken against the accused for the offences under Sections 376 and 506 I.P.C. After appearance of the accused, he was charged under Sections 376 and 506 I.P.C. and he pleaded not guilty. So, the accused was placed for trial. The prosecution examined eleven witnesses and marked eight documents apart from three material objects. After considering the evidence on record, the accused was found guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506 I.P.C. and accordingly, convicted him under Section 235(2) Cr.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month for the offence punishable under Section 376 I.P.C., and to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 506 I.P.C. Challenging the same, the accused preferred Crl.A.No.302 of 2006 on the file of the X Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur at Narasaraopet and the same was dismissed confirming the judgment, dated 3.7.2006, in Sessions Case No.348 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet on the ground that the trial Court has not committed any error. Challenging the said judgment, the petitioner filed this Criminal Revision Case.
