P.Surendra, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.9789 of 2010

ORDER:

This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A2 in C.C. No.6 of 2010 on the file of the court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vayalpad, Chittoor District.

¶4

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to avail all the remedies available to him under law. He further submitted that the petitioner is facing much difficulty to attend the trial court on each and every date of adjournment and hence his presence before the trial court may be dispensed with. There is no dispute with regard to identity of petitioner. Even if the presence of the petitioner before the trial court is dispensed with, no prejudice will be caused to the second respondent. Hence, the presence of petitioner/A2 in C.C. No.6 of 2010 before the trial court on each and every date of adjournment is dispensed with. However, he shall appear before the trial court as and when his presence is so required.

¶5

3. With the above direction, the criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as prayed for. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed.

¶6

T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J.

¶7

March 17, 2016. YS

P.Surendra, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Surendra, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Katarivari Rama, Vs K.Narasimha Reddy

Anurag Mishra Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

S.J.Suresh, Vs K.S.Jayaraman

Gandham Gangadhar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri L.Chandu Singh and 2 Others Vs the State of A.P. and Another

J.S.R. Poultry Vs The State of A.P.