Disposed

Rahul v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC28 Jun 2016CRLP/9174/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposes of a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings for sexual harassment and injury. The court directed the Magistrate not to insist on the petitioners' presence until the charge sheet is filed, instead issuing summons with bonds.

What did the court decide?

Directed Magistrate not to insist on petitioners' appearance until charge sheet is filed; summons to be issued with requirement of bonds.

Rahul Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL

¶2

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9174 of 2016

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is filed by the petitioners/A.1 & A.2 seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.113 of 2016 of Charminar Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354-D and 324 IPC against them.

¶5

2. The defacto complainant filed a complaint against the petitioners alleging that the 1^st petitioner who is her brother-in-law, teased her by passing whistle and touched her body parts intentionally. When the de facto complainant told her husband about the same and when he went to ask the petitioners, they beat him indiscriminately. It is also alleged that the petitioners also beat her father-in-law and brother-in-law and threatened them. Hence, the complaint

¶6

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners/A.1 & A.2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.

¶7

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners obtained bail in the matter. He further submits that at the time when the petitioners were remanded to judicial custody, the learned Magistrate has directed them to appear before the Court. But till now the charge sheet is not filed and the learned Magistrate is insisting the petitioners to appear till the charge sheet is filed.

¶8

5. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of directing the learned Magistrate not to insist for the presence of petitioners/A.1 & A.2 till charge sheet is filed and summons are issued. Learned Magistrate shall obtain bonds from the petitioners to appear on being summoned.

¶9

6. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶10

7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed.

¶11

M.S.K.JAISWAL,J

¶12

Date: 28.06.2016 Note : Issue c.c. in two (2) days. B/o. Rds

¶13

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL

¶14

CRIMINAL PETITION No.9174 of 2016

¶15

Date:28.06.2016

¶16

Rds

¶17

c.c. in two (2) days.

Rahul v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I.V. Ramana Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

E. Madhava Rao Vs The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp

Parigala Murali Krishna Vs The State of Ap.

A.Shobha Rani and 2 Others Vs the State of Telangana and Another

M. Somi Reddy , M. Somulu, Vs Nenavah Jyothi

Ratan Lal Agarwal Ladsaria Vs The State of Telangana