Single judge dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of proceedings as infructuous, noting that the investigating police had already referred the case as false.
Petition to quash proceedings dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.7 8 9 8 of 2 0 1 4
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) is filed to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.88 of 2014 on the file of Tenali Taluq Police Station, Guntur District, registered for the offences under Sections 494 r/w 34 IPC and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
During hearing, learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Andhra Pradesh submitted that the police after investigation referred the case as false. In that view of the matter, no further orders need be passed by this Court quashing the proceedings. Therefore, the instant Petition, which is filed to quash the Proceedings, has became infructuous and prayed to dismiss the petition.
In view of the above respective submissions of both sides, this Criminal Petition, which is filed for quashment of the proceedings, is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, in this case, shall stand closed.
____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 28.12.2016 eha
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Cr l. P. No.7 8 9 8 of 2 0 1 4
Dt. 28.12.2016 eha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings should be allowed when the case has been referred as false by the police.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. SATHYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
