Allowed

Amar Amshan v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Mar 2016CRLP/4139/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 448, 323, and 506 IPC. This decision was based on a compromise between the parties.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of proceedings in Crime No.116 of 2016 on the file of Pahadisharief Police Station, Cyberabad. Direction to pay Rs.3,000/- as costs to Telangana State Legal Services Authority.

Amar Amshan Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.M.P.No.4659 OF 2016

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL PETITION No.4139 OF 2016

¶4

ORDER:

¶5

The above Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.116 of 2016 on the file of the Pahadisharief Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 323 and 506 IPC.

¶6

When this matter has come up, the 2^nd respondent-de facto complainant and the petitioner, who appeared before this Court, represented through their Counsel that due to intervention of elders, they entered into compromise and therefore, the proceedings in the above crime may be quashed. The 2^nd respondent-de facto complainant also filed an affidavit to that effect. Both the parties filed a joint memo of compromise also.

¶7

In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the continuation of the proceedings against the petitioner-accused would be the exercise in futility.

¶8

In the above circumstances and in view of the compromise, this Court is of the view that it is just and proper to quash the proceedings against the petitioner herein. Hence, the above Crl.M.P is ordered and the proceedings against the petitioner-accused in Crime No.116 of 2016 on the file of Pahadisharief Police Station, Cyberabad, are quashed. The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand only) towards costs to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority, Hyderabad. The Registry is directed to issue a copy of this order to the parties concerned after furnishing a receipt of payment of costs.

¶9

Accordingly, the above Crl.M.P is ordered and the Criminal Petition is allowed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶10

______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶11

Date : 23.03.2016 Nn

¶12

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶13

Crl.M.P.No.4659 OF 2016 &

¶14

CRIMINAL PETITION No.4139 OF 2016

¶15

Dated 23^rd March, 2016.

¶16

Amar Amshan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amar Amshan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bijjala Thirupam Reddy Vs B.V. Subba Reddy

Veeramallu Solomon Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Inti Apparao Vs The State of A.P.

B. Vimal Sukumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Neelam Venkata Ramana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Indiramma, Vs The Director of Institute of Correspondence Courses