Syed Imran Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.3372 OF 2016

ORDER:

The present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the order, dated 30.11.2015, passed in Crl.M.P.No.718 of 2015 in M.C.No.163 of 2015 by the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast case-cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby the Court below allowed the petition directing the petitioner herein to pay an amount of Rs.8,000/- (Rupees eight thousand only) per month to the second respondent herein.

¶5

Heard and perused the records.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner herein is unable to pay the interim maintenance amount as ordered by the Court below to the second respondent herein and as such, prays this Court to reduce the maintenance amount. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the criminal petition is disposed of with the following directions.

¶7

(i) The petitioner herein is directed to pay 50% of the interim monthly maintenance ordered by the Court below, i.e., Rs.4,000/- (Rupees four thousand only) to the second respondent herein, on or before 10^th of every succeeding month;

¶8

(ii) The petitioner is also directed to pay the arrears of maintenance amount calculating at 50% of the maintenance amount ordered by the Court below, within a period of three months from the date of this order; and

¶9

(iii) The trial Court is directed to dispose of M.C. No.163 of 2015 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months, without being influenced by the order of this Court.

¶10

With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶11

JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶12

15.03.2016 pln

Syed Imran v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Imran v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Thota Laxminarayana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Thillapudi Veera Nagaraju E.G.Dist. and 4 Othrs Vs P.P. Hyd and Ano

Polasani Manjula Vs The State of A.P.

Mohd.Mustafa Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Padigala Sumanth Vs The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp