Dismissed

D.Murali Krishna v. Superintendent

Telangana HC19 Dec 2016CRLP/16801/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. which sought splitting of a cheque dishonour complaint into two cases based on amounts. The court held that the cause of action was same and dismissal of an insolvency petition did not allow splitting.

What did the court decide?

The petition to split the case under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed; the Special Magistrate is directed to decide the matter at the earliest.

D.Murali Krishna Vs Superintendent — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶2

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16801 OF 2016

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the Special Magistrate, Hayatnagar Ranga Reddy District to split C.C.No.1111 of 2015 on its file into two parts, one for Rs.2,00,000/and the other one for Rs.4,00,000/- and proceed with the trial for Rs.2,00,000/- and pronounce judgment.

¶5

It is the case of the petitioner from the beginning that the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the respondent No.3 had borrowed Rs.6,00,000/- and issued a cheque towards discharge of part of the legally enforceable debt and on its presentation for collection, it was returned with endorsement “Funds Insufficient” and thereafter, he issued a legal notice dated 4-8-2016 calling upon the petitioner to pay the amount covered by the dishonoured cheques within 15 days but failed to comply the legitimate demand of respondent, hence, the complaint.

¶6

It is the case of the petitioner that 3^rd respondent filed an Insolvency Petition to adjudge him as insolvent annexing list to schedule of creditors where the petitioner’s liability was shown as Rs.2,00,000/- but the Insolvency Petition was dismissed for default subsequently, taking advantage of dismissal, the Present Petition is

¶7

MSM,J Crlp_16801_2016

¶8

¶9

filed to split the case into two one for Rs.2,00,000/- and another for Rs.4,00,000/- in view of admission in the Insolvency Petition.

¶10

The petitioner allegedly advanced Rs.6,00,000/- to the 3^rd respondent and the 3^rd respondent issued cheque for Rs.6,00,000/- towards discharge of the part of the legally enforceable debt. Thus, the cause of action is failure on the part of 3^rd respondent to pay the amount covered by cheque after issuance of notice under Section 138-B of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

¶11

Thus, the cause of action for both the claims is one and the same and the same cannot be split into two, as such it is not a ground to allow the petition. Hence, the learned Special Magistrate, Hayatnagar, Ranga Reddy District is directed to decide the matter at the earliest.

¶12

With the above direction, this Criminal Petition is dismissed.

¶13

As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, the Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending, shall stand dismissed.

¶14

JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶15

Dated 19-12-2016. Dvs.

¶16

MSM,J Crlp_16801_2016

¶17

¶18

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16801 OF 2016

¶20

Dated 19-12-2016.

¶21

Dvs

D.Murali Krishna v. Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Murali Krishna v. Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk.Chaturvedi Vs The State

Vedangi Manga Raju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mrs. v. Vijaya Laxmi Vs State of Telangana

Nandigam Samelu , Samuel Vs The STate of Andhra Rapesh

K.S. Arun Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Adapaka Joseph, Vs Yedla Chiranjeevi Rao