The age of girl was not proved and contrary to the claim of the prosecution, as per the evidence of doctor the age of the victim girl is more than 16 years. The evidence of PW.2, victim girl, varies from the case of the prosecution with regard to her kidnap. She deposed in her evidence that she had acquaintance with the accused and he used to follow her and on the date of incident, she went to her aunt’s house and while she was returning from her aunt’s house, the accused met her and told her that he would marry her and on saying so, he took her to a military area on his vehicle and committed rape upon her and they both stayed there and on the next day at about 4.00 a.m., he left her at Koti and from there, she returned to her house. In her crossexamination, PW.2 stated that herself and the accused used to meet at Dargah near Balapur and they both went to a movie also and her parents were not aware of her movements. Therefore, PW.2 herself accompanied the accused out of her own and free will and she was not kidnapped by the accused. She further deposed that she sustained minor injuries on both her hands and also on chest. But, it was reveled from the evidence of PW.1 – Doctor, who examined PW.2, that there are no external injuries on the body of PW.2. Therefore, the
