The Court dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution, noting that appellants were not interested in prosecuting the case, and closed pending miscellaneous petitions without costs.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 1333 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
No representation is made on behalf of appellants though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that appellants are not interested to prosecute this case.
2. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed. No costs.
S. RAVI KUMAR, J
20th July 2016.
mar
S. RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
