The High Court dismissed an appeal for default caused by the non-prosecution of the appellants, noting the matter had been previously dismissed against Respondent No.1 in 2008.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
C.C.C.A.No.211 OF 1999
JUDGMENT:
When the present appeal was called on 02.09.2016, there was no representation for the appellants. Since, the present appeal is preferred against dismissal of Suit for specific performance of agreement of sale and relates to the year 1999, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
be no order as to costs.
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J
September 27, 2016. MD
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
