Justice Sanjay Kumar disposed of Contempt Case No. 840 of 2016 by dismissing the petition on the grounds of a defect arising from post-institution developments while reserving liberty to file a fresh case.
Leave to withdraw the contempt case granted; liberty to file a fresh case reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO.840 of 2016
ORDER :
Sri Maruti Jadav, learned counsel representing Sri B.S. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that this contempt case, as instituted, is defective in the light of the developments that took place after its institution and seeks leave to withdraw the same reserving liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh case.
The contempt case is accordingly dismissed leaving it open to the petitioners to file a fresh case, if warranted. No order as to costs.
____________________
JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
Date:09.09.2016
GJ
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of an instituted contempt case
Whether to grant liberty to file a fresh case
Petitioners
Respondents
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
