The court closed the contempt case alleging non-compliance with a previous order in W.P.No.38330 of 2015 because the respondent affirmed that the order had been complied with.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.776 of 2016
ORDER:
Sri B. Muralidhar, learned counsel representing Sri T. Prasanna Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the order passed in W.P.No.38330 of 2015 has been complied with.
In that view of the matter, this contempt case which was filed alleging disobedience to the said order does not survive for consideration on merits and is accordingly closed. No order as to costs.
____________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
5th August, 2016 PGS/IBL
T. Prasanna Kumar
Sanjey Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
