In a contempt case alleging non-compliance of an earlier order, the Court dismissed the complaint after counsel for respondents submitted that the order was complied with long ago, resulting in the case being disposed without a hearing on merits.
Contempt case dismissed; miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1898 OF 2013
DATED: 22.06.2016
Between: Medudula Yadagiri … Petitioner and Smt. Smitha Sabarwal and another … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1898 OF 2013
PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
None appears for petitioner. Even on last occasion, none appeared for the petitioner.
In the instant Contempt Case, petitioner alleged that the order of this Court dated 06.09.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.26201 of 2013 has not been complied. Learned counsel for respondents submits that the order has been complied long back.
That seems to be the reason why, nobody is coming forward to workout the Contempt Case on merits. Hence, we are constrained to dismiss the Contempt Case. Order accordingly.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
22nd JUNE, 2016.
________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
kvni
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Complainant has established non-compliance of the Court's order dated 06.09.2013 given that respondents claimed compliance.
Medudula Yadagiri
Smt. Smitha Sabarwal
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
