Contempt filed for non-compliance of High Court interim order on energy billing. Respondents submitted affidavit confirming compliance via revised bills. Case closed.
Contempt case closed and miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1845 OF 2016
ORDER:
The contempt case is filed alleging non-compliance of order, dated 11.07.2016, passed in W.P.No.22199 of 2016, wherein this Court directed the respondents therein to deduct the quantity of energy and the charges for the energy supplied by APGPCL from the total quantity of energy and demand recorded by them from the billing months of June, 2016 onwards, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed their counter affidavit. In
paragraph 4 it is stated as follows:
“In reply to para 3 it is submitted that as per the interim directions of Honorable High Court in W.P.M.P.No.27294 of 2016 in W.P.No.22199 of 2016 (pending disposal of W.P.No.22199 of 2016 on the file of Honorable High Court) TSSPDCL has already revised the monthly C.C. bills of M/s. Jagriti Steel Pvt., Ltd., (HT S.C.No. MBN 1102) from June 2016 onwards duly deducting the quantities of energy and demand that of (a) supplied by APCPGL Stage-II, and (b) availed under inter-state Short Term Open Access through Power Exchange (IEX):
From the total recorded quantities of energy and demand as detailed below:
| Sl.No. | Description | June 2016 |
July 2016 | August 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Energy particulars |
||||
| i) | Total recorded consumption in KVAh |
2605140 | 2599010 | 2727760 |
| ii) | Open access consumption in KWh |
2075116 | 2177192 | 2399977 |
| iii) | APGPCL State-II consumption in KWh |
130889 | 112370 | 53726 |
| iv) | Balance billed consumption in KVah(i-ii-iii) |
399135 | 309448 | 274057 |
| B: Demand particulars |
||||
| a) | Contracted maximum demand (CMD)in KVA |
4490 | 4490 | 4490 |
| b) | Monthly minimum demand in KVA |
3592 | 3592 | 3592 |
| c) | Actual meter recorded demand | 3921 | 3984 | 3990 |
2
| in KVA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d) | Openaccess demandin KVA | 72 | 350.54 | 2961 |
| e) | APGPCL State-II demand in KVA |
0 | 0 | 12 |
| f) | Balance billed demand (c-d-e) or(b)whichever ismaximum |
3849 | 3633.46 | 3592 |
In the light of the above categorical statement of respondent Nos.1 and 2, the order, dated 11.07.2016, passed in W.P.No.22199 of 2016 has been complied with and the same is being continued
from month to month.
Therefore, the contempt case is closed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed.
____________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Date: 08.11.2016
ES
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents have complied with the interim order dated 11.07.2016 in W.P.No.22199 of 2016 regarding energy billing adjustments.
State of Telangana / TSSPDCL
Jagriti Steel Pvt. Ltd.
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
