The appeal filed by legal representatives of deceased appellants, seeking continuation of an appeal against dismissal of a partition suit, was dismissed by the court with an order recording a satisfied view that the underlying suit claim was settled out of court.
The appeal was dismissed as the suit claim was recorded as settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
APPEAL SUIT No. 738 of 2006
JUDGMENT: (Per VRS,J)
This is an appeal arises out of the dismissal of a suit for partition filed in O.S.No.231 of 2000, dated 05.07.2006.
VRS,J & ANIS,J AS No 738 of 2006
2
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
appeal shall stand dismissed.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
____________________ ANIS, J. 14th September, 2016 cbs
VRS,J & ANIS,J AS No 738 of 2006
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS
Appeal Suit No. 738 of 2006
(Per VRS,J)
14th September, 2016
cbs
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal can be dismissed as a suit claim having been settled out of court based on affidavits filed by legal representatives.
Whether the appeal filed by legal representatives of deceased appellants should proceed given the alleged settlement.
Appellants 3 to 6
Respondents
V. Ramasubramanian
Anis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
