5. It is to be seen that while granting building permission, the Municipal Authorities are not obligated to make a roving enquiry into the title of the person over the property, except prima facie possession or title of the person making the application for grant of permission and the 1st respondent granted building permission basing on which the construction was made and completed. It is also to be noted that when the president of the petitioner church tried to interfere with the possession of the respondents 2 to 4, a civil suit is filed by them for grant of perpetual injunction restraining the petitioner church from their possession and the same is pending for adjudication. In that view of the matter, this court, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot go into disputed questions of fact regarding right, title or interest in the property, which can be decided by a competent civil court. Mere granting of building permission does not confer any title to any person and it is always subject to declaration of title by the competent civil court. If the petitioner has any grievance in respect of the action of the 1st respondent and the purchase made by respondents 2 to 4, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent civil court for declaration of his rights. Therefore, at this point of time, the order impugned cannot be set aside and the writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed.