Court disposed of five writ petitions under orders passed in predecessor petitions where the Board had decided not to implement C.S.R./E.S.R. conditions and APPCB memos.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos. 6586, 6593, 6610, 6628 and 7111 OF 2014
Date: 27.11.2015
W.P.No.6586 of 2014
Between:
M/s. GTN Industries Ltd., Rep., by its Authorized Signatory, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And
The Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos. 6586, 6593, 6610, 6628 and 7111 OF 2014
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.7111 of 2014. None appears for the petitioners in W.P.Nos. 6586, 6593, 6610, 6628 of 2014.
Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2 in W.P.Nos. 6586, 6593, 6610, 6628 of 2014 and respondent No.1 in W.P.No.7111 of 2014, Sri P. Shiv Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, appears for respondent No.3 in W.P.Nos.6586, 6593, 6610, 6628 of 2014 and Sri T.V.Ramana Rao, learned Standing Counsel, appears for respondent No.2 in W.P.No.7111 of 2014.
Learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.No.7111 of 2014, at the outset, invited our attention to the orders, dated 20.06.2014 and 17.07.2014, passed by this Court in W.P.No.10942 of 2014 and W.P.No.9954 of 2014 and batch respectively and submitted that these writ petitions may also be disposed of in terms thereof.
In the aforementioned orders, this Court simply recorded the statement made on behalf of the respondents that the Board has taken a decision not to implement C.S.R./E.S.R. condition and the APPCB Memos and disposed of the writ petitions.
In view thereof, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the aforementioned orders, dated 20.06.2014 and 17.07.2014.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
Date: 27.11.2015
ES
M/s. GTN Industries Ltd.
The Govt., of A.P.
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
