The Sarpanch, Yerraguntapadu, v. Mohd. Yakoob
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON’BLE…
SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON’BLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 7095 of 2005
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah)
Mr. Samson Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
22nd December, 2015
ksm
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 7095 of 2005
22nd December, 2015
ksm
G. CHANDRAIAH
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court