Petitioner sought mandamus to declare certain proceedings illegal. The cause was held infructuous at the hearing, resulting in dismissal of the writ petition and connected interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.6661 of 2015
15.09.2015
Between:
Lopinti Sankar Rao
.. Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Srikakulam and others
.. Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. Dilip Naik K. for Mr.Kalyan C.R.
Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj
Counsel for respondent No.4: Mr.M.S.R.Chandramurthy
Counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6: --
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the proceedings, dated 23.02.2015, of respondent No.5 as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, Mr.Dilip Naik K., learned counsel representing Mr.Kalyan C.R., learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.8866 of 2015 filed by the petitioner for interim relief shall stand dismissed as infructuous.
__________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
15th September, 2015 GHN
Lopinti Sankar Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
