The High Court quashed a demand notice issued by the Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor, relying on a Larger Bench judgment, and disposed of the writ petition.
The impugned demand notice dated 28-12-2004 is set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 6647 OF 2005
08-12-2015
Between:
N.P. Ramachandra Naidu
… Petitioner
And
The Dy. Transport Commissioner and Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor
… Respondent
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 6647 OF 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, invited our attention to the judgment of Larger Bench of this Court in L.Royal Reddy and others Vs. Government of A.P. and others to submit that the impugned demand notice, dated 28-12-2004, issued by the respondent is liable to be quashed and set aside in view of the law laid down in the said judgment.
Learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondent, fairly states that the question raised in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of Larger Bench and he has no objection for setting aside the demand notice.
The demand notice is accordingly set aside and the writ petition is disposed of.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
ks
08-12-2015
N.P. Ramachandra Naidu
The Dy. Transport Commissioner and Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Chittoor
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
