The writ petition filed by G. Sriramulu against the Regional Transport Officer, Nalgonda was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court, considering the petition rendered nugatory.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 6255 OF 2005
20-11-2015
Between:
G. Sriramulu
… Petitioner
And
The Regional Transport Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District and another
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No. 6255 OF 2005
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
S.V. BHATT, J
20-11-2015
kss
G. Sriramulu
The Regional Transport Officer, Nalgonda and another
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
