The High Court dismissed two writ petitions for nonprosecution as learned counsel for the petitioners were absent on the posted date when the case was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos. 6086 AND 6087 OF 2004
COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
On last occasion, none appeared for the petitioners and hence, the writ petitions were directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today. Today also, learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. Hence, we are constrained to dismiss these petitions for nonprosecution. Order accordingly.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. No
order as to costs.
______________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, J
_______________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
15-04-2015 ks
DILIP B. BHOSALE
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
