The single judge dismissed the writ petition for lack of presentation/reply despite it being listed for dismissal, ordering no costs and closing miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.5236 OF 2001
ORDER:
Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner and respondents.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution but in the circumstances without costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Dt.13-11-2015
bv
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
