Disposed

Gangasani Ravinder Reddy, v. State of Telangana, Repby its Prl. Secretary to Govt

Telangana HC7 Dec 2015WP/5223/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition by permitting the petitioner to submit objections regarding land regularisation before authorities within two weeks, directing respondent consideration within three months thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to submit objections within two weeks; respondents directed to consider objections and take decision within three months.

Gangasani Ravinder Reddy, Vs State of Telangana, Repby… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

¶2

Writ Petition No.5223 of 2015

¶3

Dated 0 7 th December, 2015

¶4

Between:

¶5

Gangasani Ravinder Reddy

¶6

…Petitioner

¶7

And

¶8

State of Telangana, rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others

¶9

…Respondents

¶10

Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Meherchand Nori

¶11

Counsel for respondent No.1: GP for Municipal Administration (TS) Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri Ajay Kumar M. Counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4: Smt.Pingali Lakshmi

¶12

The Court made the following:

¶13

ORDER:

¶14

This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:

¶15

“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 1^st respondent in issuing Proceedings in Letter No.21403/M1/2013, dt.07.01.2014, without considering the request for deleting the entire land in Sy.No.25/B (Old) and New Sy.No.25 of Kazipet Jagir village of Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal district from D.P.No.35 of 1992 is illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to delete the entire land in Sy.No.25/B (Old) and New Sy.No.25 of Kazipet Jagir village of Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal district from D.P.No.35 of 1992.”

¶16

After arguing the case, Sri Meherchand Nori, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that his client will be satisfied if he is permitted to submit his objections before respondent No.2 to the proposal for regularisation of draft layout in respect of Survey Nos.17 to 19, 25, 27 of Kazipet Jagir (V) and Survey No.548 of Waddepally (V).

¶17

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit his objections within two weeks from today. Within three months from the date of receipt of objections from the petitioner, respondent No.2 shall consider the same and after notice to the petitioner and developer of the layout, it shall take appropriate decision.

¶18

As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WP.M.P.Nos.6945, 6946 & 47520 of 2015 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

¶19

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

¶20

07^th December, 2015

¶21

VGB

Gangasani Ravinder Reddy, v. State of Telangana, Repby its Prl. Secretary to Govt

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gangasani Ravinder Reddy, v. State of Telangana, Repby its Prl. Secretary to Govt

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Venkateswara Rao S/o Tirupathaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Sri M.Mallaiah Dharmashala, Vs State of Telangana

Velama Aruna Vs Gadde Chakrapani

Smt. Kondaveeti Krishna Kumari, Vs The Commissioner of Endowments

Dr.Dinkar Bhole S/o Late Dr.Raghunath Bhole Vs The State of Telangana

V.Venkatalakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh