The Writ Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel for the petitioners was absent on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.4722 of 2005
ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 06.02.2015, learned Counsel for the petitioners was absent. Today also when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the petitioners is absent.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________________ (A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
20.02.2015 vs
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
