Single judge order disposing of a writ petition for implementation of an earlier order. The court directed the fourth respondent to examine the petitioner's request and take steps expeditiously, then disposed of the petition.
Directed the 4th respondent to examine the petitioner's request and take steps expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
W.P.No.42661 of 2015
ORDER:
The petitioner is aggrieved by non-implementation of the order of the 3rd respondent dated 11-06-2009. The petitioner states that the 5th respondent had challenged the said order in W.P.No.20887 of 2009 and the said writ petition was dismissed on 16-12-2014 and thereby, the order of the 3rd respondent has attained finality. Seeking implementation of the said order, the present writ petition is filed.
Heard the learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
In the circumstances, I deem it appropriate to direct the 4th respondent to examine the request of the petitioner and take appropriate necessary steps expeditiously.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J
Date: 31-12-2015 Prv
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
W.P.No.42661 of 2015
31-12-2015
Prv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for implementation of an earlier order should be disposed of by directing the respondent to examine the request.
Petitioner
4th Respondent
VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
