Single judge dismissed the writ petition, holding that an internal correspondence between the Mandal Officer and the respondent constituted no adverse order, rendering the petition premature to examine on merits or entertaining.
Writ petition dismissed; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.42511 OF 2015
ORDER:
As on today, it is premature to examine as to whether the resumption is justified on the facts and circumstances of the case. Hence, if any action is intended to be taken by the 4th respondent against the petitioners, he shall follow due process of law and take appropriate action.
2. The impugned order in the present writ petition is merely an internal correspondence between the Mandal Officer, Nalgonda and the 4th respondent, and there is no adverse order passed against the petitioners. Therefore, there are no reasons to entertain the writ petition.
3. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR.
Date :30.12.2015 gvl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained where the impugned order was merely internal correspondence with no adverse order passed against the petitioners.
Petitioner
4th Respondent
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
