Karri Marinamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed the petitioner to submit an explanation despite a delay in service of the notice and granted an interim stay against dispossession of the land.
What did the court decide?
Permission to submit explanation by 04.01.2016; stay against dispossession; no order as to costs; MCs closed.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No.41994 OF 2015
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
The petitioner complains that she was given notice on 08.12.2015, though notice bears Rc.No.157/2015/A, dated 24.11.2015. Paragraph Nos.6 and 7 of the affidavit state that the Tahsildar, Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam, the
4th respondent, is not accepting any explanation on the ground that 15 days time was already over. The petitioner, however, claims to be in possession of the subject land as per Patta since 1993 and is stated to have lost her husband in the year 1996 and has to look after her four children. Alleging that further action is sought to be taken against the petitioner without giving opportunity to submit her explanation, the present Writ Petition is filed.
It is evident from the impugned Form - I notice, dated 24.11.2015, that the petitioner was called upon to submit her explanation within 15 days. However, the said notice is stated to have been served on the petitioner only on 08.12.2015. Hence, in the interests of justice, I deem it appropriate to permit the petitioner to submit her explanation on or before 04.01.2016 and on receipt of such explanation, the 4th respondent shall consider the same on its own merits and take appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with law. Pending passing of the appropriate orders, as above, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the land in question.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be permitted to submit her explanation despite the expiry of the notice period.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
Tahsildar, Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam
Coram
Vilas V.Afizulpurkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/41994/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court