The Court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage, directing respondents to decide the petitioner's representation regarding his fitness for a job within six weeks, taking into account a prior order and his medical condition of epilepsy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
W.P.No.41556 of 2015
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. With the consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
3. The writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in issuing proceedings vide Ref.No.SRP/PER/2-006/3512, dated 10/14.08.2015, declaring the petitioner as fit for the same job without conducting proper medical examination and without assessing the actual physical condition though he is suffering from Epilepsy as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently, to grant all the consequential benefits.
4. Though the writ petition is filed urging various grounds, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner in the month of June, 2015 and pass appropriate orders at the earliest.
5. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents did not dispute the same.
6. Without going into the merits of the case and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representation made by the petitioner in the month of June, 2015, in accordance with law and taking regard to the order, dated 30.9.2015, passed in W.P.No.31497 of 2015 of this Court, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
7. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Date: 22.12.2015 AMD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
W.P.No.41556 of 2015
DATE: 22.12.2015
AMD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition permitting disposal with a direction to dispose of the representation within six weeks, should be disposed of?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondents
C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
