Sri Jetavath Srinivas (Naik) Vs The Government of Telangana

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 40014 of 2015

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for respondents.

2. Petitioner in this Writ Petition questions the proceedings dt.04.12.2015 of 3^rd respondent suspending the petitioner’s fair price shop dealership authorization. On the same day, a show cause notice was also issued to the petitioner by the 3^rd respondent setting out a charge against him.

¶5

3. Although the counsel for the petitioner sought to contend that merely on the basis of allegations in Section 6A case registered against the petitioner, the suspension pending enquiry has been directed by the 3^rd respondent, I am unable to agree with the said submission, because the impugned proceedings dt.04.12.2015 indicates independent application of mind. The petitioner is therefore directed to submit his explanation to the show cause notice dt.04.12.2015 issued by the 3^rd respondent. The 3^rd respondent shall complete the enquiry into the allegations against the petitioner within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after following the principles of nature justice and giving a personal hearing to the petitioner.

¶6

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶7

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand dismissed.

¶8

____________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶9

9^th December, 2015 cbs

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION No. 40014 of 2015

¶12

9^th December, 2015

¶13

cbs

Sri Jetavath Srinivas (Naik) v. The Government of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Jetavath Srinivas (Naik) v. The Government of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atluri Hemanth S/o Umamaheswara Rao Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by

Samskruti College of Engineering and Technology Vs The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal

M/s.Siva Sai Security Services, Door No.85/194, Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport

B. Sri Ramulu s/o Pedda Sunkanna, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

U.Venkata Raja Reddy Vs The Executive Engineer

N. v. Ambadas, Vs The State of Telangana