Disposed
M.A. Jaleel Saw Mill, v. The Divisional Forest Officer
Telangana HCWP/39664/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.39664…
What the court decided
AI extract
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.39664…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.39664 of 2012 Date:02.9.2015
Between:
M.A.Jaleel Saw Mill, Nizamabad, reptd by its ProprietorM.A.Lateef
..... Petitioner
And:
The Divisional Forest Officer, Nizamabad and two others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. M.Dhananjay Reddy
Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Forests (TS)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare letter, vide Rc.No.2744/2007/N6, dated 29.11.2012, issued by respondent No.1 as illegal and arbitrary. Along with the counter-affidavit, respondent No.1 has filed proceedings in Rc.No.2744/2007/N6, dated 17.01.2013, wherein it is stated that he has withdrawn his earlier proceedings, dated 29.11.2012, which is impugned in this Writ Petition, but rejected the petitioner’s request for renewal on a different ground, challenging which the petitioner has filed a separate Writ Petition.
In the light of the above facts, both the learned counsel have submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, disposed of as
infructuous.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.50390 of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
__________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA
REDDY
02nd September 2015 DR
M.A.Jaleel Saw Mill, Nizamabad
The Divisional Forest Officer, Nizamabad
two others
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court