P.Narasimha Murthy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO

Writ Petition No.32428 of 2015

ORDER:

Heard Sri PVV Satyanarayana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, Sri MSR Chandramurthy, learned special counsel for the 2^nd respondent and Sri Chimalapati Ravi, learned standing counsel for the 3^rd respondent.

¶5

2 . The petitioner was appointed as Field Assistant at Yetigaairampeta Grampanchayat, Golugonda Mandal, Visakhapatnam District on 27.12.2007. Basing on the social audit report, the 2^nd respondent vide proceedings dated 18.08.2015 kept the petitioner under suspension. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order of suspension is not based on any specific allegations and therefore, it is liable to be set aside. On the other hand, learned special counsel for the 2^nd respondent submits that since the impugned order is passed pending regular disciplinary enquiry, the same does not require any interference.

¶6

3. Having gone the submissions on either side, without going into the merits of the case, the 2^nd respondent-Project Director is directed to complete the enquiry against the petitioner and pass appropriate final orders in accordance with the Rules, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which the order of suspension shall stand revoked.

¶7

4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

R. KANTHA RAO, J

Date: 07.10.2015

BSS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO

¶12

11

¶13

Writ Petition No.32428 of 2015

¶14

Date: 07.10.2015

¶15

BSS

P.Narasimha Murthy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Narasimha Murthy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geesala Nagamani, Vs Deyyala Srinivasu

Vemuganti Rama Rao, Vs The State of Telangana

A.Seenaiah Vs The a.P.State Road Transport Corporation rep by its

N. Sudarshan, Vs T.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Executive Director

Kota Jagadeeswara Rao, S/o. Kota Appa Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

V.C.Mohan, E-212219, Conductor, Vs The Tsrtc rep by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director