A petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent on the dates of hearing. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.3199 of 2004
ORDER:
The learned counsel for petitioner was absent when the matter was called on 30.01.2015 and it was posted to today under the caption ‘for orders’. Even today also when the case is called, the learned counsel for petitioner is absent.
2. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J Date: 20.02.2015 MVA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.3199 of 2004
Date: 20.02.2015
MVA
null
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
