Disposed

Smt. Marturi Sujatha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC1 Oct 2015WP/31895/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ petition seeking promotion consideration for an Anganwadi Helper to the post of Anganwadi Worker. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation within eight weeks in light of the applicable memorandum.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17-8-2015 for promotion to the post of Anganwadi Worker within eight weeks.

Smt. Marturi Sujatha, Vs State of Andhra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2015)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO

¶2

Writ Petition No.31895 of 2015

¶3

Order:

¶4

Heard Sri V.S.K. Rama Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare for the respondents 1 to 4.

¶5

2. The petitioner is Anganwadi Helper of Chejerla village in Ongole Mandal of Prakasam district. It is submitted by her that if the post of Anganwadi Worker at the same place is to be filled up, her case for promotion to the post of Anganwadi Worker has to be considered in terms of Memo dated 0501-2012 issued by the Director of Women Development and Child Welfare, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad which is to the effect that if the post of Anganwadi Worker is vacant in the same village and where Anganwadi Helper is qualified, she may be considered to be appointed as Anganwadi Worker, provided she has fulfilled the conditions laid down in G.O.Rt.No.102, dated 28-3-2011. It is the version of the petitioner that in the same unit, the post of Anganwadi Worker is lying vacant. Therefore, she filed the present writ petition to consider her case for promotion to the post of Anganwadi Worker. She submitted a representation dated 17-8-2015 to the respondents for considering her case to the post of Anganwadi Worker.

¶6

3. Under these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 17-82015 submitted by the petitioner in the light of Memo dated 05-012012 and pass appropriate orders thereon having due regard to the qualifications of the petitioner for the post of

¶7

Anganwadi Worker within a period of 8 (eight) weeks

¶8

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs.

¶9

___________________ R.KANTHA RAO, J.

¶10

01^st October, 2015.

¶11

¶12

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO

¶13

Writ Petition No.31895 of 2015

¶14

01^st October, 2015.

¶15

(Ak)

Smt. Marturi Sujatha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Marturi Sujatha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Burada Jayamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M. Chandra Mohan, Vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport

E. Jaya Raju, S/o. Late E.Sadhu, Vs Ap State Irrigation Development Corporation Ltd.

V. Eswaraiah Vs The A.P. Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

D.S.N.V.M.S. Kumar, Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

Dr.D.Lakshminarayana Raju, S/o. Chinna Swamy Raju Vs Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanam