Krishna Manikya Varma. B, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
What did the court decide?
This application is false.
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE…
This application is false.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN
Present
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.31183 of 2015
Between:
Krishna Manikya Varma B., S/o. Sri B.B. Varmaji Rao, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Assistant Engineer, TSSPDCL, R/o.Plot No.72, Nava Nirmana Nagar, Hyderabad – 500 033.
.. Petitioner
AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Department Energy, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & 3 others
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.31183 of 2015
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner represents that petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a better affidavit as certain facts, which are necessary, could not be mentioned in the writ petition. A letter to this extent is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on 29.12.2015.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a better affidavit. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_____________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 30th December, 2015
KL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.31183 of 2015
Date: 30th December, 2015
KL
Krishna Manikya Varma B.
The State of Telangana
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court